On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org>
wrote:

> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Franck Martin" <fra...@peachymango.org>
> *Cc: *dmarc@ietf.org, "Scott Kitterman" <skl...@kitterman.com>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:20:30 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [dmarc-ietf] Jim Fenton's review of -04
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I think we should recommend something here, not sure if it needs to be
>> normative. We do say to ignore the SPF policy when p!=none, though I think
>> we can be normative on the lower layers. I see 2 options here:
>> 1)tempfail the message is either SPF and DKIM have a tempfail status
>> 2)tempfail the message if both SPF and DKIM have a tempfail status
>>
>> 1) is my preferred and is aggressive, therefore not sure people will like
>> it. I'll settle for 2)
>>
>> As explained in another post, I'm worried I can run a DNS attack (or just
>> a self inflicted DNS bad config) and get DMARC to reject emails it should
>> have accepted (has the DMARC policy in cache, but cannot assert SPF and
>> DKIM).
>>
>>
> I think it's reasonably clear from 5.6.3 that the "fail open" choice is
> possibly dangerous, as is anything that fails open.
>
> But more importantly, I'm also worried about making a normative decision
> now about something we deliberately haven't specified up to this point for
> whatever reason.  We are supposed to be documenting current practice with
> this effort, not establishing something new.
>
> Might this something best left for the standards track WG effort?
>
> Fair enough, but curious about standard practice. For instance what
> openDMARC do? and others?
>
> I think DMARC got us to be "stricter" and less "lenient" with email.
>
>
OpenDMARC gets the message only after OpenDKIM is done with it, so if
OpenDKIM temp-fails, OpenDMARC never even sees it.  Thus, the case we're
concerned about here can't ever happen.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to