OK, seriously, I hope I don't have to crack this open again. Conflict review is slated for the 1/8 telechat, and a flurry of last minute edits might not sit well with the IESG. We need to leave actual work, as much as at all possible, to the WG, and not to hacking on the ISE version.
Diffs to -09 which will be in -10 within the next few days: http://blackops.org/~msk/dmarc/diff.html -MSK On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote: > On December 29, 2014 2:32:27 PM EST, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> > wrote: > >On 12/29/2014 10:40 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >TO: > >>> > > >DMARC evaluation can only complete and yield a "pass" result when one > >of the underlying authentication mechanisms passes for an aligned > >identifier. If neither passes and one or both of them failed due to > >>> >a > >temporary error, the Receiver evaluating the message is also unable > >>> >to > >conclude that the DMARC mechanism had a permanent failure and thereby > >can apply the advertised DMARC policy. > >>> > > >>> >This looks good to me. > >> Shouldn't it be cannot apply the advertised DMARC policy? > > > >Actually, no, but I also was confused. It took me some serious effort > >to decide that the current wording was correct. And a spec should not > >require that sort of linguistic diligence, IMO. > > > >Looks like a small change can make your form correct... > > > >So I suggest: > > > > DMARC evaluation can only yield a "pass" result after one > >of the underlying authentication mechanisms passes for an aligned > >identifier. If neither passes and one or both of them fails due to a > >temporary error, the Receiver evaluating the message is unable to > >conclude that the DMARC mechanism had a permanent failure; they > >therefore cannot (yet) apply the advertised DMARC policy. > > > >d/ > > I think that's better. I'd prefer to leave out the parenthetical yet as I > think it raises ambiguity rather than reduces it. > > Scott K > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
