That diff format is a little challenging. You might try using "rfcdiff", which eliminates a lot of the reporting of changes that amount to just moving across page breaks and the like.
Anyway, I'll give it a thorough review this evening. Thanks for the quick turnaround! -MSK On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Franck Martin <fra...@peachymango.org> wrote: > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com> > *To: *dmarc@ietf.org > *Sent: *Friday, January 30, 2015 1:23:48 AM > *Subject: *[dmarc-ietf] Comments on draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability > > Thanks for putting this together. Here are the results of a late-night > first-time reading: > > > Thanks for suggestions after late-night reading > > > Section 2: > > The sentence starting "This the secondary" appears to be mangled. I can't > parse it. > > Me neither yet, it is Friday, asking co-authors for suggested text, will > fix later... :P > > > Section 2.1, paragraph 1: > > Fixed all the rest, you can see a diff at > > https://github.com/dmarc-ietf/id/commit/24ccb9507086e05732ff477ec7330a481bebcee9#diff-8b30e28a625f335e70d97d9b89dcd243 > > if you are ok, and when I have section 2, I'll push as -01. > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
