----- Original Message ----- > From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com> > To: "Franck Martin" <fra...@peachymango.org> > Cc: "Tim Draegen" <t...@eudaemon.net>, "dmarc" <dmarc@ietf.org>, > ned+dm...@mrochek.com > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:43:52 AM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] interoperability draft for review
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Franck Martin < fra...@peachymango.org > > wrote: > > > I don't believe the use of X-Original-From is described in any RFC > > > currently. > > > > If we're going to talk about it in section 4.3 we need to talk about how > > > > it's actually used or refer to some place that does. > > > it is RFC5703 > > That's Original-From, so I guess just mention that the X- version was the > pre-standardization name and might still be in use in some places. I'll check the text but there is something like this. > Aside: I'm surprised that RFC5703 doesn't include the registration template > required by RFC3864. It is listed here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-headers.xhtml#perm-headers
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
