MH Michael Hammer (5304) writes: > How does the recipient know that the NPO has permission? In fact, > how does the recipient know that it is really the NPO if it is > spoofing the existing donor's email address?
He doesn't, and he doesn't. That's my point: absent some form of authentication, he doesn't know, and Outlook's use of "on behalf of" doesn't help one bit. > This is meaningless to the recipient in terms of authenticating the > relationship or the From: if the From: email address is "spoofed". Terry specifically asked what I don't like about Outlook's header display. There was no question about authentication AFAICS, and I certainly didn't try to answer any such question. > Sender in its present incarnation is not particularly useful, > period. I don't disagree. I just think Outlook's display makes it worse than useless. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
