2. Causes of Interoperability Issues This section focuses on intended recipient perspective but fails to mention/discuss the originator perspective where some subset of originators, particularly for high value transactional messages, want the message discarded if it passes through an intermediary and is modified in any way resulting in a failure to validate. Examples of such messages include those related to financial organizations and medical establishments.
2.1 (This is just a nit) Last paragraph SPF can provides two Authenticated Identifiers... This should be "SPF can provide two Authenticated Identifiers..." > -----Original Message----- > From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Franck Martin > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:50 PM > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Subject: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dmarc- > interoperability-02.txt > > FYI > > Please post more reviews... > > ----------------- > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt > has been successfully submitted by Franck Martin and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability > Revision: 02 > Title: Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows > Document date: 2015-04-28 > Group: dmarc > Pages: 20 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability- > 02.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02 > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02 > > Abstract: > DMARC introduces a mechanism for expressing domain-level policies and > preferences for email message validation, disposition, and reporting. > The DMARC mechanism can encounter interoperability issues when > messages do not flow directly from the author's administrative domain to the > final recipients. Collectively these email flows are referred to as indirect > email > flows. This document describes interoperability issues between DMARC and > indirect email flows. Possible methods for addressing interoperability issues > are presented. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
