In article <d2d6ac82.24ca7%[email protected]> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >In light of all of the discussion about how the LHS of email addresses are >normalized and encoded/hashed in order to be used to >publish certificates and keys via DANE records like SMIMEA and OPENPGPKEY we >have put together an approach that lets a zone owner >signal the policy that is used for their domain by adding a few keywords to >the DMARC record. > >The draft is at: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-osterweil-dmarc-dane-names/
Since this is a a draft about mail operations, I would strongly suggest that you post it to the ietf-smtp list, where people with experience in nontrival mail systems hang out. In particular, you might ask about "canonicalization policy of LHS portions of email addresses", and to move things along, you might want to review RFC 5321 and find a better term than LHS. I also share Kurt's concern that it seems like a bad idea to mix advice intended for MUAs with the existing DMARC advice which is purely for MTAs. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
