> Hi Kurt, > > On 1 Apr 2016, at 19:13, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote: > > > > Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability problems > > with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to our next > > activity phase? > > > > Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document from > > "draft" to "hey! all done!" status? > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)
> One of the chairs should do shepherding write up and request publication > using datatracker. Or find another person who can serve as the document > shepherd. I'll take care of it. > > > > From the group charter: > >> Phase I: > >> * Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail flows > >> and plausible methods for reducing them. > >> Phase II: > >> * Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows > >> * Draft Guide on DMARC Usage > >> Phase III: > >> * Review and refinement of the DMARC specification > >> * Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage > > > > I think that we need to update our target milestones a bit since they still > > call for everything to be completed by May 2015. > That would be great! > Alexey, > Who would become the responsible AD for this group on Wednesday evening. I won't be there but may be online. Ned _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc