On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Kurt Andersen <ku...@drkurt.com> wrote:
> The grammar is indeed terrible and needs to be fixed. The intent is that > the AAR reflects the computed A-R at the time the message enters a trust > boundary. Only the A-R that it computes is put into its ARC set as the AAR. > Depending upon implementation, an ADMD may affix an ARC set both upon entry > and exit or may implement an ARC set that effectively spans the transit > through its domain. > So it's nothing more than an A-R with an instance number and a different field name. Presumably you want the new name specifically to permit addition of the instance name, and to bind it to a specific ARC Set without having to do the dance with the authserv-id. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
