Ok - nice to know I'm not the only one thinking this (means I'm not
totally crazy). I'm willing to drop my draft and just contribute/review
this one. There is no reason to have multiple drafts trying to do the
same thing.
Scott
On 04/06/2017 07:55 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article <ac345fcc-ae8e-a92a-0ec3-4792529c8...@nist.gov> you write:
This may be of interest to this group, as there isn't an active DKIM WG
anymore.
At the DISPATCH session at IETF 98 I pitched a proposal to update DKIM
with a new crypto algorithm and/or a more compact key representation
(put the key in the signature and put a hash of it in the DNS.)
Reaction was positive, people told me to write a proposed charter,
which starts here:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg06701.html
Also see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dcrup-dkim-crypto/
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
