Hi Kurt, On 31 May 2017, at 06:49, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote:
>> even if we need to discuss the next steps, we haven't done that on the list >> yet, so we >> don't know that we need face time for it. > > Most of the effort has been focused on getting ARC deployed in to production > so there has been relatively little attention to the "what's next" question. > Peter had started a thread a few months ago but it did not get much (or any) > traction. How sacrosanct is the "deliverable" list in the charter? I know > that we are constrained from going beyond the charter, but do we have to > write documents that may not be of value just because they are listed in the > charter? The WG can recharter, but you will need to convince me (as the Area Director responsible for this WG) and the rest of IESG that the new work/charter is better than the old one. Rechartering is not hard, if there is enough WG support for it. Best Regards, Alexey
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
