On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:57 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> In article <CAD2i3WNh4nWehG=MJe8injQyCpxf5jrrg8CFO5AYo87fGh7Ktw@mail. > gmail.com> you write: > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-10#section-10) > >feels clunky and itself says it needs more work. > > To put it mildly. > > >Assuming we're proceeding as an Experiment, I propose we address rotation > >in a separate draft. > > I understand the motivation, but I think that if we do that, it makes > it a lot less likely that people will actually implement the > rotation stuff. > I still don't understand why we need to say more than DKIM did on this topic. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
