> I'd like to request a F2F meeting in London at IETF101. I plan to create a > WGLC-eligible draft as soon as the 7601bis-01 work lands in a form that can > be referenced by the protocol spec. > > Ideally we could launch WGLC for the ARC protocol before the end of > February.
Let's change that from "ideally" to a firm commitment, can we? Progress hasn't been ideal, and we need to set schedules that we'll keep. > IETF101 would be a great opportunity to discuss the next steps for the WG. I'm happy to have that time; I will request a one-hour session. I expect that we won't be spending any of that session time on the ARC protocol document itself. Ideally (ah, there's that word...) we can spend some time reviewing early results of using ARC in the field. In other words, let's see some implementations and find out how well this works in practice. Barry, off to make a session request _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
