On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> Would it be possible to insert a dnswl method in the new spec? > [...] > I'd prefer to do this as its own document. The current one is feeling very "kitchen sink" already, and this change has more meat to it than the others that have been requested. > Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it; > dnswl=pass dns.zone=list.dnswl.org > policy.ip=127.0.9.2 > policy.txt="ietf.org https://dnswl.org/s/?s=1703"; > I have a few things I'd like to see done differently in your expired draft: * "dnswl" is specifically a whitelist; should we also register "dnsbl"? Or do we really need two distinct entries for the same mechanism? * I think "policy.txt" is under-specified. A downstream agent shouldn't be expected to know how to decode this, and it can change from one implementation to the next. * Why repeat "policy.ip" for multiple replies, rather than comma-separating the various replies? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
