On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
That would probably be me, but I don't know what the local-part
problem is. My intention was to import the local-part changes from
the EAI RFC.
The problem has to do with the ambiguity that is being imported along with
those local-part ABNF changes.
It's importing the changes directly from the EAI spec:
"local-part" is defined in Section 3.4.1 of [MAIL], as modified by
[RFC6531].
Unless there is some lurking bug in RFC 6531 I don't understand what the
problem is unless it should be this:
"local-part" is defined in Section 3.4.1 of [MAIL]. In an
EAI-formatted message, the definition is modified as in
[RFC6531].
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
