On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:44 PM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]> you > write: > > This is the relevant text from > >https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/ > agreements/agreement-approved-31jul17-en.html > > But the paragraph at the end of that section, Exhibit A, says: > > If Registry Operator wishes to place any DNS resource record type or > class into its TLD DNS service (other than those listed in Sections > 1.1 or 1.2 above), it must describe in detail its proposal and submit > a Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) request. This will be > evaluated per RSEP to determine whether the service would create a > risk of a meaningful adverse impact on security or stability of the > DNS. Registry Operator recognizes and acknowledges that a service > based on the use of less-common DNS resource records and/or classes in > the TLD zone, even if approved, might not work as intended for all > users due to lack of software support. > > Registries make RSEP requests all the time. They're tedious and fairly > expensive, but the process is straightforward. Is this something that could be within the remit of the dmarc-wg if we wanted to pave the way with ICANN across the board? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
