On 7/16/18 9:17 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Jim Fenton <fen...@bluepopcorn.net
<mailto:fen...@bluepopcorn.net>> wrote:
I suggest that as part of WG Last Call that the DNS Directorate be
consulted, largely to socialize this with them so they aren't
surprised by the request load requirements.
Should the draft say more than what Section 9.2 already says?
9.2 describes the problem, but it's expressed in terms of a DoS attack
on (primarily) validators. The DNS folk will be more concerned with the
overall load on the infrastructure caused by ARC, not specifically on
attack scenarios. So in consulting the DNS directorate, it would be good
to mention the operational impact of 9.2.
I also wonder if it would be helpful to mitigate the operational impact
by saying that AS SHOULD use the same selector as the associated AMS.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
