On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Brandon Long < blong=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > Do we actually have consensus on what to do, though? > > The current proposal seems pretty bad, sign one or all depending on vague > things that might be different per impl. > It does not seem to me like we have consensus. Can we pick one option for this experimental phase and re-evaluate afterward? For the sake of non-ambiguity, I'd suggest the "sign one" approach. During the experiment we can see how often it has to be invoked and request people to examine those cases for further evaluation. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
