On Monday, January 14, 2019 10:54:37 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Sun 06/Jan/2019 06:45:57 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Here's what I've come up with. This is a diff between RFC7601 as > > published and what I propose as RFC7601bis to resolve all of the > > DISCUSSes and most of the COMMENTs from IESG review. Please let me know > > if I've missed anything. I'll post it at the end of the coming week if > > there are no issues raised. > > > > http://www.blackops.org/~msk/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-rfc7601bis-from-rfc7601 > > .diff.html > I see sender-id still has full citizenship. Now I'm not clear which will be > first, but my feeling is that rfc7601bis and > status-change-change-sender-id-to-historic are going to be published more or > less at the same time. > > When a method is moved to historic, are the corresponding parameters in the > IANA registry moved to deprecated? If yes, should the move be stated by > which document?
A quick look at Domainkeys in the registry and RFC 7601 will answer that question for you. Let's not hold this up. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
