In article <2902055.CzhLQO0xIX@l5580> you write: >Here's the definition we have in the draft now: > >> 2.6. Non-existent Domains >> >> For DMARC [RFC7489] purposes, a non-existent domain is a domain name >> that publishes none of A, AAAA, or MX records that the receiver is >> willing to accept. This is a broader definition than that in >> NXDOMAIN [RFC8020]. > >That's what I was expecting this new tag to apply to (and I think matches >their expectation, but they can speak for themselves).
That's OK. >Another way to say what's in 2.6 now might be: > >... a domain for which there is a NODATA response for A, AAAA, and MX records. Not so OK -- if there's no records at all at or below a name you really will get NXDOMAIN. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
