On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:07 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:45 PM Steve Atkins <st...@wordtothewise.com> > wrote: > >> > It's interesting that the industry has decided to interpret "p=reject; >> pct=0" the way we intended "p=quarantine; pct=100". >> >> It's semi-explicitly defined that way in the RFC, isn't it? >> > > If so, we should fix it because (a) I don't think that's how we intended > it, and (b) in any case, nothing in there should be only semi-explicit. > > -MSK > _______________________________________________ > My recollection is that we definitely did not intend that. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
