In article <c586258d8480a4ff71d3c14bef10cf3aec66ab7d.ca...@aegee.org> you write: >Current wording for p=quarantine > quarantine: The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the > DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as > suspicious. Depending on the capabilities of the Mail > Receiver, this can mean "place into spam folder", "scrutinize > with additional intensity", and/or "flag as suspicious". > >Amendment to the wording for p=quarantine: > >… or reject at SMTP level. ...
No. We really, really, don't like changes that aren't backward compatible. You can do what you want but there is no chance I would ever make p=quarantine a signal to reject, and I think I am not atypical. R's, John PS: You can of course do whatever you want on your own system. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
