On Thu 08/Aug/2019 14:52:58 +0200 Freddie Leeman wrote: > So how should 'null reverse-path'-messages be processed (in the future)? I > see three options: > > - Element's minOccurs gets changed to 0 and ‘null reverse-path’ messages > are added without the 'envelope_from' element > - Element's minOccurs stays 1 and ‘null reverse-path’ messages get an > empty 'envelope_from' value
This option is easy to grasp, as it parallels SMTP's mail from:<> > - ‘null reverse-path’ messages are excluded from DMARC reports > > Do 'null reverse-path' messages add any substantial value to DMARC reports? Not less nor more than the ones having a possibly spoofed reverse path. jm2c Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
