In article <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad...@dcrocker.net> you write:
>This goes to the essential challenge of a proposal like PSD.  It 
>embodies a particular model, in the absence of clarity about the model 
>or broad-based discussion of its appropriateness.  (Note, for example, 
>that my review offered some discussion of that sort but got no comment 
>on that discussion.)
>
>In effect, it creates a strategic solution -- that is, a long-lived and 
>embedded mechanism -- without a clear and broad understanding of the 
>organizational space it is working in.

I've been talking to some of the PSL people, and they seem really
stuck.  They know they don't have a way to describe vanity
single-registrant TLDs, and I don't even want to suggest that they
might want to describe something like PSD, with a super-authority
above a suffix boundary.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to