In article <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad...@dcrocker.net> you write: >This goes to the essential challenge of a proposal like PSD. It >embodies a particular model, in the absence of clarity about the model >or broad-based discussion of its appropriateness. (Note, for example, >that my review offered some discussion of that sort but got no comment >on that discussion.) > >In effect, it creates a strategic solution -- that is, a long-lived and >embedded mechanism -- without a clear and broad understanding of the >organizational space it is working in.
I've been talking to some of the PSL people, and they seem really stuck. They know they don't have a way to describe vanity single-registrant TLDs, and I don't even want to suggest that they might want to describe something like PSD, with a super-authority above a suffix boundary. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
