On 12/9/2019 4:41 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
I mean, the PSL is already a maintained object. Is this new detail
something
that has different ownership/privacy/etc concerns than the existing
details?
So, ummm, you want to replace one problematic operation with another?
On the consumption side, I've only heard comments that the PSL has
problems. On the provision side, I've heard vigorous and repeated
claims of overwork of the the volunteer force, sufficient that there is
no bandwidth for dealing with revision/replacement efforts.
I'm sure I probably missed this, but couldn't we avoid this question
by just mandating
no reporting for non-existing organizational domains? Is that a
non-starter?
Without commenting on the merits of that suggesting, I'll offer that it
is an example of why this spec is -- at its very best -- still
incomplete, or at least the thinking about how it will get used is
incomplete. (if workable at scale.)
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
