In article <CAL0qLwYn_=751b---rqFmiPa9RcdAPBtCEowH1AO1=bn8ue...@mail.gmail.com>, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> <snippage> >>> >>> I think what Dave proposed about PSL separation from DMARC is entirely >>> appropriate and pragmatic, and in fact probably easy enough: DMARC is >>> changed so that it says the organizational domain is determined using some >>> process [currently] external to DMARC, and then a second document explains >>> how that process is accomplished using the PSL (and/or PSD, depending on >>> when the experiment result comes in).
The current DMARC spec essentially says the first part, that you have to find the org domain but waves its hands about how. I really would not want to make the PSL a requirement for any spec. The people who maintain it say in large letters on their web site not to use it for any new applications. There's no technical bar to doing something else. I have running code for a DNS lookup technique that does everything the PSL does without a tree walk at https://github.com/jrlevine/bound The problem is that we seem unable to agree on any PSL or not-PSL like thing. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
