Re: [dmarc-ietf] What if... Sender:

[Scott Kitterman]

On June 25, 2020 10:18:21 PM UTC, Jim Fenton <fen...@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:
>On 6/25/20 2:20 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>
>> Even before you get to those:
>>
>>> The working group will seek to preserve interoperability with the
>>> installed base of DMARC systems, and provide detailed justification
>>> for any non-interoperability.
>
>The paragraph goes on to say:
>
>> As the working group develops solutions
>>    to deal with indirect mail flows, it will seek to maintain the
>>    end-to-end nature of existing identifier fields in mail, in
>>    particular avoiding solutions that require rewriting of originator
>>    fields.
>I interpret that "seek to" as of equal importance to the previous one.
>But we're spending an awful lot of WG bandwidth discussing rewriting,
>while Dave's "what if" proposal doesn't require any.

True, but I think it's on topic for a DMARC replacement working group, not this 
one.

Scott K

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc