In article <faada008-12c3-59f8-49b5-4a71882bc...@tana.it>, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: >> 4. Some explicit loop prevention specification may be added. For example: >>> 4.1. send reports from a subdomain having a DMARC record without ruf=, or >>> 4.2. never send failure reports about failed reports. >> >> The latter, which is consistent with SMTP never generating a bounce about a >> bounce. > >However, SMTP has an operational definition of bounce, MAIL FROM:<>. Should >we >take the same stance? That is, send failure reports with an empty bounce >address and never send failure reports to bounces or failure reports?
We're talking about DMARC failures, not SMTP delivery failures. I don't see what the latter has to do with the former. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
