On Sat 12/Dec/2020 19:56:58 +0100 John Levine wrote: > In article <6c5878e8-fdd8-05c0-3b60-ba180ecbc...@tana.it> you write: >>Maybe it's me, but I don't understand the change below. The only difference >>I >>see between Old: and New: is the removal of «minOccurs="1"». Since that is >>the >>default value, I see no incompatibility. What am I missing? > > If there is neither minOccurs nor maxOccurs, the field occurs exactly once.
I agree that specifying «minOccurs="1"» is redundant and could be avoided. Best Ale >>> <xs:complexType name="IdentifierType"> >>> <xs:all> >>> <!-- The envelope recipient domain. --> >>> <xs:element name="envelope_to" type="xs:string" >>> minOccurs="0"/> >>> <!-- The RFC5321.MailFrom domain. --> >>> <xs:element name="envelope_from" type="xs:string" >>> minOccurs="1"/> >>> Old: >>> <!-- The RFC5322.From domain. --> >>> <xs:element name="header_from" type="xs:string" >>> minOccurs="1"/> >>> >>> New: >>> <!-- The RFC5322.From domain. --> >>> <xs:element name="header_from" type="xs:string"/> >>> >>> </xs:all> >>> </xs:complexType> -- http://www.chrismadden.co.uk/cartoon-gallery/occams-razor-ockhams-razor-too-complicated/ _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
