All Can we please stop with the non constructive discussions here?
tim On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 1:27 PM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: > > On 12/14/20 10:09 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 12/14/2020 10:00 AM, Michael Thomas wrote: > >> When we tell you it's not a problem, > > > > Except that the telling was by you. Alone. > > > > And you've yet to respond to the observable fact that receivers have > > been ignoring the directive language. > > > > Or that many folk misunderstand the semantics of DKIM, thinking it > > means that message authorship is validated. > > > > I'll ignore the whataboutism, but point out that you have never produced > one piece of evidence where the language of p=reject or any of the other > previous labels has caused software design decisions to change for the > worst. I don't even know what would qualify as a mistake. So yes, I'll > take my direct experience of writing code over your indirect innuendo > any day. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
