Yes, put whatever you think is appropriate in the ticket, including a link
from the dmarc archive to this thread, so that when it is reopened the
group has appropriate context

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:31 Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:

> I'll try to propose some text for the ones that would require
> modifications in the ticket. I assume that is appropriate?
>
> Mike
> On 12/30/20 10:29 AM, Seth Blank wrote:
>
> Thank you filing these tickets.
>
> With regards to which tickets are actively open, I’ve asked the document
> editors to push on open tickets, stand by.
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:21 Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/30/20 10:13 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> > On Wed 30/Dec/2020 17:38:29 +0100 Dotzero wrote:
>> >> And for the second time, that is not a DMARC problem, it is an
>> >> auth-res problem.
>> >
>> >
>> > Standardizing the result names for dmarc authentication method is an
>> > integral part of DMARC specification.
>> >
>> > Added ticket 91
>> > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/91
>> >
>> I opened a ticket too which basically says that there should be a
>> normative Authentication-Results Requirements section in the base
>> specifications. That was a process error from the very beginning with
>> auth-res and its weird semi-official status. I don't think it has ever
>> been discussed whether it is even a protocol or not as Ned brought up
>> (opened a ticket on that too).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> --
> *Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
> *e:* s...@valimail.com
> *p:* 415.273.8818
>
>
> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
> proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
> authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
> recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
> distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
> and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
> this email and then delete it from your system.
>
> --

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* s...@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to