In article <afe0e8fd-bbac-9e0d-859c-0fdfcf839...@tana.it> you write: >On Sun 24/Jan/2021 19:49:34 +0100 Michael Thomas wrote: >> issue #99 needs to be addressed. > >Won't we put a DKIM-Signature: in the http: header?
No, there's no spec for signing an http transaction. If you want a client domain identity, It's easy enough to permit a client SSL certificate, but as I have pointed out a few times, since there are no recipient domains in an aggregate report, they don't provide anything useful to link to. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
