On 2/1/2021 10:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Mon 01/Feb/2021 17:38:07 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote:
Consider the challenges to ensuring a DMARC pass. That's a pretty
high barrier to entry against generating reports.
Well, if a mail site is unable to get a DMARC pass, they have more
urgent problems to solve than setting up aggregate report generation.
No, they probably don't have more urgent problems. Sites choose not to
adopt DMARC for a variety of reasons. It's probably a good idea to
respect that variety.
The model that a receiving site is not allowed to report DMARC traffic
unless that site is also generating DMARC authentication is
Procrustean. And as I noted, is likely counter-productive.
I understand the zeal that drives a lot of the effort to promote DMARC,
but the danger with aggressive proselytizing is that it changes from
serious technical and operational evaluation into purely religious fervor.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
dcroc...@gmail.com
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crock...@redcross.org
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
