On Fri 19/Mar/2021 15:09:31 +0100 internet-drafts wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
[...]


Much better!

There's still a few style points that I'd propose. They can be dealt with in auth48.


*Introduction*

The PSL is not mentioned yet.  Therefore:

OLD:
   This document specifies experimental updates to the DMARC and PSL
   algorithm cited above, in an attempt to mitigate this abuse.

NEW
   This document specifies experimental updates to the DMARC specification
   in an attempt to mitigate this abuse.


*Example*

Since the algorithm (last word) hasn't been mentioned yet:

OLD
   Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a
   scalable strategy.  The intent of this specification, therefore, is
   to enhance the DMARC algorithm by enabling an agent receiving such a
   message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is present at
   "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC algorithm.


NEW
   Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is obviously not a
   scalable strategy.  The intent of this specification, therefore, is
   to enhance DMARC discovering method by enabling an agent receiving such a
   message to be able to determine that a relevant policy is present at
   "gov.example", which is precluded by the current DMARC specification.


*Discussion* (optional)

The phrase "of the tree" is useless and can be deleted. That way, the first appearance of the term "tree" is deferred to Section 2.2, where it is put forth cleverly, by implicitly recalling that the term refers to graph theory, since the root is near to the top.

OLD
   o  Branded PSDs (e.g., ".google"): These domains are effectively
      Organizational Domains as discussed in [RFC7489].  They control
      all subdomains of the tree.  These are effectively private
      domains, but listed in the Public Suffix List.  They are treated
      as Public for DMARC purposes.  They require the same protections
      as DMARC Organizational Domains, but are currently unable to
      benefit from DMARC.


NEW
   o  Branded PSDs (e.g., ".google"): These domains are effectively
      Organizational Domains as discussed in [RFC7489].  They control
      all subdomains.  These are effectively private
      domains, but listed in the Public Suffix List.  They are treated
      as Public for DMARC purposes.  They require the same protections
      as DMARC Organizational Domains, but are currently unable to
      benefit from DMARC.


*DMARC PSD PSL Extension*

Here comes the first appearance of the string "PSL:

OLD
   [psddmarc.org] provides a PSL like file to enable to facilitate
   identification of PSD DMARC participants.  Contents are functionally
   identical to the IANA like registry, but presented in a different
   format.

NEW
   [psddmarc.org] provides a file formatted like the public suffix list
   (PSL) in order to facilitate the identification of PSD DMARC participants.
   Contents are functionally identical to the identical to the IANA like
   registry above, but presented in a different format.


Best
Ale
--


















_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to