On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 1:43 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Tim, > > > > Thank you for your quick reply and the updates to the document. > > > > My comment on section 5.1 was actually on section 4.1 ... Sorry about the > mix, I should drink more coffee it seems :-o > > > Ahh, I see what you are referring to. I think it was written as a subsection with the thought of adding this section to the Privacy Considerations section of the DMARC-bis document. Perhaps some wording to reflect this? "If this experiment is successful, this section should be incorporated into the Privacy Considerations section of DMARC-bis" ? tim
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
