On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:46 AM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > > 2. I’d welcome other inputs here on the original idea for this > option. I would imagine modern systems would be able to deal with rather > >large XML files, though MTAs routinely set limits under 50M for accepting > messages. > > I suggested an option to deliver reports by https POST or PUT, like > MTA-STS does, > with precious little interest, even though it's a much more efficient way > to ship > large files around since it doesn't need base64 encoding and doesn't relay. >
I agree that it's optimal. But long ago (in DKIM, at least) we took note of the fact that mail people and DNS people in large organizations are often not the same teams and sometimes it's hard for one to get something out of the other. If that logic also holds for mail people and web people, I imagine the lack of interest here has a similar basis; we're talking about standing up a whole service or endpoint here, not just adding records to a zone file. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
