On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 4:19 PM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was referring to this section of RFC 7208, which I have interpreted as a > replacement for the older language of RFC 5321. > Perhaps I overgeneralized, and it is acceptable/desirable to send NDRs if > the system is confident that the return-path target is not forged. > My perception has been that NDRs are widely ignored even when they are > sent. Is your experience different? > I interpret the cited RFC 7208 text to mean: "If you do SPF checking, then don't generate an NDR to an address that has failed the SPF test." It doesn't supersede the more general guidance of RFC 5321, to which SPF is basically an add-on. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
