It appears that Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >All, > >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis > > Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub- > registry. New entries are assigned only for values that have been > documented in a manner that satisfies the terms of Specification > Required, per [RFC8126]. Each registration must include the tag > name; the specification that defines it; a brief description; and its > status, which must be one of "current", "experimental", or > "historic". The Designated Expert needs to confirm that the provided > specification adequately describes the new tag and clearly presents > how it would be used within the DMARC context by Domain Owners and > Mail Receivers. > >I don't believe we can actually remove said tag from the IANA registry, >but we can mark them as "historic", and remove the text from the >new document.
Marking it "historic" seems appropriate, since that'll keep future versions of DMARC from using it for something else. -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
