On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:03 PM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: > >On Fri 28/May/2021 17:46:54 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: > >> Greetings. > >> > >> Consensus on Ticket #54 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/54> > (Remove or > >> expand limits on number of recipients per report) was reached during > the May 27 > >> DMARC Interim to update the text in the DMARC URIs section to read: > >> > >> The place such URIs are specified (see Section 6.3) > >> allows a list of these to be provided. The list of URIs is > separated by > >> commas (ASCII 0x2c). A report SHOULD be sent to each listed URI > provided in > >> the DMARC record. > > > > > >Works for me. (Note that a limit of 100 recipients is silently enforced > by > >most underlying MTAs.) > > That's 100 recipients per SMTP session. Nothing keeps you from sending > mail to 10,000 > recipients in 100 sessions. I do not think this detail affects the > decision to take > out the limit since it's hard to imagine a useful scenario with as many as > 10 recipients. > > -- > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly >
+1 Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
