It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: >I'd raise to MUST the media type, but leave the filename at SHOULD. >The MUST can be limited to the components, so that the same content >results in identical filenames. > >I'm not sure the filename is required for interoperability. Do report >consumers rely on the filename or on the values contained in it? What >do they trust if they differ? (Do they even compare them?)
If I see an identical filename I assume it's a duplicate. Has anyone ever seen a report filename that didn't follow the rules? I haven't, so might as well make it a MUST so people aren't tempted to cheat. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
