On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 9:40 AM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: > >My impression is that the group is generally okay with PSD=y. I prefer > it over your suggestion. My strongest preference is that we pick > something, stick with it, and move on. > > I think I see where Ale's confusion is coming from. If we switch to a > tree walk, we will have an algorithm rather than a heuristic, so > anyone looking at the same domains and the same set of DMARC records > will get the same result. It also occurs to me that in the absence of > a PSL-like thing, the idea of an organizational domain is no longer > useful. >
Aren't we basically trying to identify the same thing, just in a different (and more robust) way? I'd be careful about saying "no longer useful"; doing so implies a much bigger change than we might be aiming to "sell" here. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
