Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk in -06

[Scott Kitterman]

On March 24, 2022 6:53:13 PM UTC, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
>It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy  <superu...@gmail.com> said:
>>-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:35 AM Ken O'Driscoll <ken=
>>40wemonitoremail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Having different behaviour for the absence of the tag and the default
>>> value will be unnecessarily confusing and not intuitive.
>>
>>I'm confused.  In the absence of the tag, don't you apply the default?
>>That is, aren't these necessarily the same thing?
>
>Currently, no.  psd=n means one thing, psd=y means another thing, and no psd 
>at all means a third.
>
>My suggestion is to allow explicit or default psd=u for the third thing.

I've revised my opinion based on the discussion.  I agree this is the way to 
go.  I'll put together some words in the next day or three.

Scott K

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc