Folks, Ticket was opened to address "Report-ID" in aggregate reporting. Today, RFC7489 (Section 7.2.1.1) refers to a "msg-id" that it uses from RFC5322 as the format that is required. The document then goes on to say that the true purpose of the field is to ensure that the receiver can identify duplicate reports and handle as necessary. This has been carried forward into the aggregate reporting draft.
Should we change this to specifically state the report must be a unique identifier from the reporter perspective, and stop at that? No need to attempt to create some format to be explicitly follow, etc? "The Report-ID MUST be a unique identifier for the report generation system and the domain (domain-name from 7.2.1.1) to which the report applies. The string should be created using some number of ASCII characters. Otherwise, no format guidance is provided." Thanks -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
