It appears that Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >I believe I read that thread, and don’t believe I saw a consensus that this >should change. > >https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/uAcbvK49M8qI5o36qnJnyg_hULY/ > >Reviewing that again still suggests no consensus, perhaps even leaning toward >“no”. Scott >said “not a forensic document” and “not related to DMARC”.
I agree with Alex. There was no support to add those things to aggregate reports. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
