On Tue 28/Mar/2023 17:49:57 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I can live with it [the <discovery_method>] since it's optional (I
don't think it'll get a lot of traction), but I do think it's misplaced. I
think it's metadata, not message data as it's about how the receiver processed
the message, not about anything that was found in the message.
Agreed, it should be in <report_metadata>, before <report_id>.
In addition, couldn't we add there also a <reporting_software> or similar
element to write the name+version of the software that collected and formatted
the data? The <discovery_method> probably depends on that, but possibly also
on local system configuration.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
