On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 9:40 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 10:44 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> Also, state that serious consideration includes testing p=quarantine; >> pct=0^H t=y. > > I was going to say something similar but I think that it is implied by > section A.7
Actually, I like referencing A.7 here as a pointer. This achieves consensus on the rewrite objection. A.7 describes the rewrite without condoning it: Operational experience showed ... ... header rewriting by an intermediary meant that a Domain Owner's aggregate reports could reveal to the Domain Owner how much of its traffic was routing through intermediaries that don't rewrite the RFC5322.From header
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
