On Sat 10/Jun/2023 21:03:00 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
For clarity, I don't think the tree walk should drive a version bump (and we already went over that, let's resist the temptation to do it again), but if it did, then I would rather stay with the PSL.
Let's recall the logic we adopted to design the tree walk: On Sat 26/Feb/2022 18:14:30 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
I'm finding it hard to understand the advantage of a scheme that requires millions of DMARC records to change rather than one that changes 52.
Please, no version bumps.
+1 Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
