I hated that concept until I tried it out with a client, a law firm, and they loved it and I saved them massive headaches. The general purpose we used was a subdomain just for lists and it’s worked perfectly so far.
I’m now in favor of advocating general purpose domains. Let’s get ESR to put that term in the Hacker’s Dictionary and we’ll be set. ☺️ > On Jul 7, 2023, at 12:18 AM, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > > On Thu 06/Jul/2023 21:01:48 +0200 internet-drafts wrote: >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message >> Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF. >> Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and >> Conformance (DMARC) >> Authors : Todd M. Herr >> John Levine >> Filename : draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-28.txt >> Pages : 72 >> Date : 2023-07-06 > > > Section 7.6, Expansion of Domain Owner Actions Section, final paragraph: > > In particular, this document makes explicit that domains for general- > purpose email MUST NOT deploy a DMARC policy of p=reject. > > Wasn't this rejected already? > > > Best > Ale > -- > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
