On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, at 11:11 AM, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Jesse Thompson <z...@fastmail.com> said:
> >I'm beginning to think that a solution to this problem is "other channels"
> >
> >Let's discuss p=interoperability, p=compliance, or p=orgname:policyname
>
> Please, no. This WG has already run a year past its sell-by date. Stuff
> like this will just tell the world that we'll never finish.
Apologies. I wasn't trying to disrupt dmarcbis finishing. Ever since I saw
consensus start to form, I started citing dmarcbis whenever explaining how
DMARC works (or should work) to people who need to know. Most are still relying
on the original language/assumptions as the basis for their knowledge, so there
are going to be questions to answer and operational practices to think about
during the transition period (forever). Is there a better place to discuss
future topics like this?
Jesse
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
