One thing I forgot to mention: On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:29 AM Wei Chuang <weihaw= 40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Our suggestion is that there is not a lot of value in including this > language in the bis document if the likely outcome is that it will be > ignored, and rather more effort should be placed with a technical solution > for interop with mailing lists. > Absent a viable technical solution, I think the key thing should be the correctness and appropriateness of the advice, not the likelihood that people might choose to ignore it. -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
